home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ralph.vnet.net!usenet
- From: mauricej@vnet.net (Maurice Jeter)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: works in Borland but not in Microsuck Visual C++
- Date: 15 Mar 1996 14:25:18 GMT
- Organization: ...
- Message-ID: <4ibuke$hui@ralph.vnet.net>
- References: <4ia6h8$jes@news.vanderbilt.edu>
- Reply-To: maurice@msn.com
- NNTP-Posting-Host: mjeter.vnet.net
- X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.7
-
- In article <4ia6h8$jes@news.vanderbilt.edu>,
- haseltbt@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu says...
-
- > The following program was written in completely standard
- C++
- >and should be portable across platforms. However, it only performs as
- >expected (i.e. sends two copies of 4 to the standard out stream) in
- Borland
- >C++; when compiled in MicroSUCK Visual C++, it outputs 4 followed by a
- random
- >integer in the thousands.
-
- Check out the Visual C KB for any issues regarding this; Jump over to
- Microsoft's Home Page and go to the Support page (I don't remember what
- its called).
-
- I moved from BC to VC 4; a lot of my code would not compile due to
- different function names and parameters, and very strict type checking,
- but once I got everything modified I was very please with it.
- Unfortunately it doesn't seem to catch as many potential errors that BC
- can (such as "code has no effect").
-
- ---
- Maurice Jeter (maurice@msn.com)
- CIS: 72622,3606 MSN: Maurice
- http://www.vnet.net/users/maurice
-
-